If someone is looking for the "best lawyer in criminal matters", mitch engel law bramptonhe is likely to face a serious problem, a problem that seems to him that he needs not just a lawyer, but a lawyer attorney, the best, the expert, the most experienced, the one who will decide on the case that will save him.
By writing the "best lawyer" in the search engine, a number of results will appear, including such as, for example, "Top 10 Lawyers".
First of all, the concept of "best lawyer" may well be, to exist in the people's speech, and probably to have such or such a lawyer with a great reputation, but any official ranking would be contrary to the Law of the Attorney, and if it is unofficial, whether it answers the truth would be a question there is no unequivocal answer.
The truth is the following: The court decides the criminal case, not the lawyer, and decides it on the basis of collecting, presenting and discussing evidence in adversarial proceedings, the parties to which the accused is, the attorney and the prosecutor, but sometimes other countries with different functions, such as a private prosecutor, a civil claimant and others, are also involved.
Witnesses, experts, technical assistants participate in the process, so that with the behavior of all this colorfulness, the picture of the work itself is being prepared and prepared for its outcome, whether good or bad, expected or unexpected, fast, normal, or slowly achieved.
The court is obliged to apply the law precisely because if it does not apply it, it is threatened with the annulment or modification of the verdict by the order of the in-house (two or three-stage control) or by the order of the resumption of criminal cases.
Therefore, if we talk about the "best lawyer in criminal matters," then that would be the lawyer who imposed his own view on the justification of his client, and it was adopted and enforced with the Judgment of the Court.
However, it cannot always be the case, on the contrary. As can be seen from the statistics, a small percentage of cases end with acquittals (only a few percent of their total). Because of this, a lawyer cannot win all the business and justify all clients.
It is impossible for a lawyer to commit himself to the outcome of the case simply because he does not write the final judgment and the outcome of a case does not entirely depend on either the skills or the efforts of the attorney. He can make a well-guessed assumption about the outcome of the case, point out what is the expectation of the development of the facts, but decide it, whether it is neither a function nor a power of this kind. A lawyer is a party to the case, as the defendants or defendants are, and the Prosecutor as representative of the prosecution, so the attorney as well as the prosecutor cannot decide the cases unless they enter into an agreement between them, of course, with the consent of the accused, which again needs to be approved by the Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment